...the very cheapness of literature is making even wise people forget that if a book is worth reading, it is worth buying. No book is worth anything which is not worth much; nor is it serviceable until is has been read, and re-read, and loved, and loved again; and marked, so that you can refer to the passages you want in it, as a soldier can seize the weapon he needs in an armory, or a housewife bring the spice she needs from her store.
- from "Of Kings' Treasuries", by John Ruskin
The Kings' Treasuries would be the good books that are being neglected, as the end of the age of reading seems to be upon us. John Ruskin was lamenting that in England in 1865, just think of how much more true that lament would be today. Ruskin laments how the sentences of good books worth buying and reading are not intelligible to them, the general public, are unable to "understand any thoughtful writing - so incapable of thought has it become in its insanity of avarice."
If Ruskin saw this state of the public in his time, and we see it as well so abundantly in our time, has the human condition changed or is it this perpetual, never-ending strand of the human situation - that ideas which penetrate into the deeper questions are so unappealing to the general public they cast it away. If that is the case, the result is the focus of the majority of society abhor reading and claim they cannot understand the good, thoughtful, or classic books, nor do they see purpose in them. It is a philistine mentality of the mundane, an attitude repelled by anything that challenges their very comfortable place built around them. He goes on to explain these types are usually the ones who will spend huge sums to pursue some pleasure they follow, and call those who buy books to build a personal library "mad, a bibliomaniac."
Ruskin points out how we as a society talk about the need we have to nourish our bodies, such as with good food, but we neglect the essential part of life - food for the mind. Ruskin calls it a "provision for life, and for the best part of us," and I of course agree with that. Yet he ponders how long someone will consider buying a somewhat expensive book, before they pay the sum for it, comparing that to a fat fish they don't hesitate to buy that is much more expensive when compared to a small fish (for the food comparison, how often do we eat out, spending a large sum on restaurants, drinks, or food delivery without hesitation).
To buy books is better than loaning from a library, Ruskin argues. In order to read, re-read, and annotate, and then reference later. It's like having at the ready the good words and ideas to expand, defend, reply, reflect on (that well equipped armory). Food for the mind always available.
I am afraid in today's modern book market, so much out there is not well written and lacking a life-giving message (or now is AI written), that it is necessary to be scrupulous to find the well-written ones that are worth the time. This is likely an unpopular opinion, but think about it. Some of the books that win awards today are painful to read - with half-written sentences, stilted dialogue, and poor storytelling (politically driven, no character development, totally predictable, or just ramble). It's good to be creative and do things in a different way, that's not to be diminished. But even novels that are purely fun can be well written. When we praise writing that lacks skill and deep thoughtful processes of storytelling, we drive the culture further along that road of diminished talent, expectations drop and the 'top' books leave much to be admired.
Good things take time, effort, and are worth the work. To sum up Ruskin's thoughts, he would say that books, science, art, and architecture should be thoughtful and time consuming, not pushed out ASAP to get the highest profit. Virtues go out the window when all you care about is the profit or fame - the whole meaning of the work shifts - from, outward looking to inward looking, selfish to scorn all other past work whose efforts you forget and never feel thankful for. Yet, paradoxically, you never could be where you are (we all are) without those who came before us. And how can you produce good going forward when you cannot see, understand, or appreciate that which came before you?